Greens favour gender discrimination - female-only swimming

Don't expect sense from the Greens.

Pro-homosexuality, pro-gender-bending of every description, and supposedly "pro-equality".

Yet somehow despite all that, they now claim they want long term dedicated government-funded female-only swimming space.

'It's not just for Muslim women, it's for all women. Pregnant women, older women, women who've just had a baby, women who are self-conscious about their size and weight, women with disabilities.'

Yah - what about man women?

I feel like a woman, and remember, you have no right to tell me what gender I am.

Just look at Occupy Everything - one of the rules purportedly posted at the entryway to one of their camps said you must not assume anyone's gender, but wait for it to be disclosed.

So hey, I might look hairy on my chest, and my breasts might be remarkably diminuitive, but I'm a woman, and I'll sue you if you say otherwise.

Hey - they sued Andrew Bolt for questionning the ethnic identification of fractional Aborigines, so I'll sue the gehenna out of you if you question my gender affiliation.

That's what the Greens stand for, right? Sexual freedom, gender freedom, equality, all that bizzo.

So any pool that purports to be for "all women" but excludes "man women" is absolutely hypocricy on the part of the Greens.

Ever heard of bigender? I could even swim in the women's area one minute, then decide I'm male the next.

And so all those Muslim women so glad to shelter in a protected women's-only swimming area, kindly funded by taxpayers courtesy of Green vision, they might get quite a shock when their female bliss is interrupted by a male who the same Greens define as a female based on self-identified gender affiliation.

And the Greens love it. Well, everywhere except this pool perhaps.

There ain't nothin' Green about women's-only swimming areas when your very ideology says anyone of any birth gender can identify with whatever gender they want.

Kinda looks like an attempt to buy Muslim votes.

Y'know, those same Muslim votes swayed by this carrot, might be most hideously repulsed when the hand that feeds them turns a blind eye to the shemales who grace the same pool.

And this :

'The government is happy to explore ways to meet women's-only options, and we're investigating options at the new Gungahlin facility and in other facilities, both public and private,'

That's nice - so gender discrimination is actually ok, just so long as you favour women?

Get this, men, "gender equality" doesn't mean "gender equality", it means "female superiority". Although of course even Obama admits that - saying publicly in one speech that women will surpass men in accomplishments because, hey, they're just better than men.

And now, winning illogic-of-the-hour award :

'Ensuring broad community access is important and we don't want to exclude half the population from a significant new piece of infrastructure.'

Um - exactly which half of the population is being excluded here? The male half, as far as I can tell.

Last I knew, a lot of femmes like strutting their stuff in front of men. If they didn't, why in my short lifetime has the typical swimsuit gone from one piece to two iddy-biddy-tiny pieces? Why are the 8 year old girls at the swimming pool dressed in outfits more scant than a new bride's lingerie of decades past? As best I can tell, a lot of 'em like it the way it is. If they didn't, they'd wear something ... substantial.

So this "half the population" bizzo is absolute nonsense.

Reference : For our eyes only

UPDATE :

Just a few more salient snippets :

'It's not just about them looking at us, it's about us being exposed to men wearing Speedos.'

'Women who feel they cannot be in swimmers in front of men for religious or cultural reasons are among those likely to use the facility but also older women, those who feel self-conscious about their bodies and women recovering from injury or illness such as breast cancer.'

Swap the gender and see how ridiculous claims of "gender equality" are. Can you imagine the government going along with the following?

'We need male-only swimming areas. It's not just about women trying to alure us, it's about us being exposed to women wearing bikinis. Men who feel they cannot view parades of female flesh for religious or cultural reasons are among those likely to use the facility, but also older men, men who feel self-conscious about lacking a six-pack or recovering from hernia surgery, or illness such as cancer of the privy member.'

Somehow, strangely, the Greens would scream "DISCRIMINATION! GENDER FAVOURITISM!", but they go right along with it - nay, champion the cause - if it puts women ahead of men.

They don't believe their own "equality" mantra.

But then again, hey, who's surprised - Greens ideology just doesn't work when rubber meets road.